Business Value from the Cloud — A Look into the CapEx vs OpEx Conundrum from a Financial Lens

This quick post is the outcome of a long discussion with a friend and subsequent weekend research.

Let’s cut to the chase, and get straight to the point. One of the key arguments quoted in favour of adopting the cloud is: “It helps you convert your CapEx into OpEx.”

But, lower capital expenditure (CapEx) and thus potentially higher operating costs (OpEx) — seem counter-intuitive for a financial investor seeking to maximize EBITDA. Here’s why:

Illustrative Income Statement, which shows how higher Operating Expenses lead to lower EBITDA. However, CapEx can be depreciated and doesn’t affect the EBITDA.

In general, operating expenses reduce EBITDA. Since EBITDA is a measure of profitability before depreciation, capital expenses do not affect EBITDA. As a result, a scenario with lower operating expenses and higher capital expenses — characterizing the on-premises approach (opposite of cloud) — would have a more positive impact on EBITDA.

So this begs a question: Why would it make business (and hence financial) sense to focus on increasing EBITDA? By extension, when does it make sense to have a preference for CapEx over OpEx? Conversely, when does a preference for OpEx make more sense for an enterprise, to manage it’s digital and data?

We’ll take a look at both cases: CapEx vs OpEx and their accompanying business and financial benefits, followed by some concluding remarks. Hope you find this information useful.

I (with the unwavering support from GenAI and Google) have come up with a few possible reasons. With optimism as high as Snoop Dogg, I look forward to more reasons from you based on your experience, expertise and of course, Google + GenAI assistance.

Why and when higher EBITDA and CapEx makes sense?

• Companies are typically valued at an EBITDA multiple. So higher value helps in bumping up the valuation.
• EBITDA is often considered a proxy for operating cash flow. By focusing on EBITDA, companies can emphasize (read signal to investors) their ability to generate cash from their core operations, before considering the impact of financing and taxation.
• Holding substantial tangible assets through high CapEx can positively impact the company’s balance sheet, showcasing a strong asset base. As this generally enhances the overall valuation of the enterprise, making it more attractive to investors and lenders.
• Some investors view companies with significant capital investments as more stable and committed to long-term growth. This eventually leads to lower cost of capital for the enterprise (as more investors/banks are willing to lend money to fuel its growth via equity/debt)
• In certain industries, having a high level of CapEx is a standard practice. Companies may align their capital expenditure strategies with industry norms to maintain competitiveness and meet expectations set by stakeholders.
• Capital investments may be justified if they result in long-term cost efficiencies. For example, hosting and running a GenAI model in-house vs calling APIs may result in cost savings due various fixed costs getting spread across users if usage crosses a threshold in consumption. We can think of it simplistically as the classical fixed vs variable cost analysis. Ignoring the security/control aspect, in-house option may still make sense purely from a financial standpoint.
• Some enterprises may prefer to own critical assets, such as data centres, to have greater control and security over their operations and reduce dependence on external providers. This ownership can be reflected in higher CapEx.

Note: Nature/quality of CapEx is also important, and its determined by the nature of business the organisation is in. So savvy financial investors can see through this and figure out the quality of investments, and whether they align with the core competency and strategic direction of the business or not.

Get Sumeet Agrawal’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

Why and when higher OpEx makes sense?

Image credits: AWS Training via Skill Builder. AWS can be replaced by any cloud, and conceptually it still means the same thing.

• Investors should also consider the cash required for upfront and ongoing capital expenses — incurred while managing on-prem operations. While this option with larger capital expenses may have a positive impact to EBITDA, it also requires more cash to support the on- premise systems. As a result, building internal infrastructure/software could tie up cash flow otherwise available to grow the business’s core operations.
• Opportunity cost of not being able to scale in order to meet the spike demand, as well as the cost of idle infrastructure during lean periods can potentially outweigh the financial benefits of CapEx/EBITDA listed above. The same investors lured by your financial savviness may dump your stock for lack of business savviness.
• No upfront capital investment is helpful for a fledgling business or during a funding winter. “Asset light business model” is another term you’d encounter, especially in the world of start-ups, when a business would rather be leaning on OpEx than CapEx.
• OpEx over CapEx is also favourable when demand is uncertain or there’s a lot of fluctuation.
• Agility and innovation: Want to modernize your infra or rapidly develop a new capability due to a competitive imperative? Its easier to do it by renting it out via Cloud (OpEx) than securing approvals and buying stuff yourself.
• Cloud providers handle physical infrastructure maintenance, updates, and security, reducing the burden on in-house IT teams. This can lead to cost savings related to staffing and ongoing maintenance.
• Another cost often ignored in the comparisons is the time spent by leadership in creating business plans, budgets and approvals for making CapEx decisions. Cloud costs to be spent as OpEx are usually a very nimble business decision.

So which is the better option then? Well, “depends” said especially by a consultant, is the answer which comes a close second to 42 as the answer to everything. While consultants peddle themselves as “trusted advisors” (myself included), its important to DYOR. Following pointers should help:

• There has been a wave of cloud repatriation in the recent past, underscoring the point that not everything is black and white — forget hunky dory — in the world of cloud. There are definite benefits but they come along with ifs and buts, which need to be understood and managed well to derive the promised business value.
• Hybrid cloud approach can possibly make sense to get the best of both worlds. Egress costs, determining which loads to run/store where, unified governance, security/compliance are some of the factors to be looked into before taking the leap.
• Some organisations have also explored options like co-location services (via companies like Equinix — the WeWork of data centres if you will).
• Business Value can be objectively found out leveraging financial analysis, like finding NPV of CapEx vs OpEx decisions. However, the key is to identify and capture all the right costs and benefits associated with both paths. Another challenge is to agree upon the right “discount rate” for determining the discounted cash flows. This rate can be a function of cost of capital or the opportunity cost. To this date, aligning on this crucial parameter in your financial model remains more of an art than science.
• So, if an organisation is trying to invest in its future and wants to be more efficient with its long-term capital, it might be better for it to invest in CapEx rather than OpEx. Alternatively, if a company wants to preserve capital and maintain flexibility, it might be better off incurring OpEx instead. This is purely from a financial perspective, but as we know, security, agility and scalability aspects also need to be factored in to make the right decision.

Cheers!

Bonus for reaching until here. In case you liked the Snoop Dogg joke above…

“Yo, check it out, it’s your boy Snoop D-O-double-G, and we talkin’ ‘bout this hybrid cloud vibe, you feel me? Now, listen up. It’s like this — sometimes you gotta mix it up to get the best flavor. It’s like, you got the cloud doing its thing, and you got your on-premises holdin’ it down. It’s a mashup, aight?”